Information on Result #3108205
There is no (45, 134, 1627)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (45, 133, 1627)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 422469 400209 623231 367019 683884 012150 501963 870058 379932 268146 580363 754512 594670 199694 682865 862923 196750 753732 680999 423148 089889 > 9133 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.