Information on Result #509288
There is no (45, 133, 1627)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 422469 400209 623231 367019 683884 012150 501963 870058 379932 268146 580363 754512 594670 199694 682865 862923 196750 753732 680999 423148 089889 > 9133
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (45, 134, 1627)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |