Information on Result #3109349
There is no (66, 115, 41762)-net in base 9, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (66, 114, 41762)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 078870 604334 289218 862450 316162 216167 937885 847842 681883 184808 765275 212312 841685 010841 538163 018762 049498 716289 > 9114 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.