Information on Result #508644

There is no (66, 114, 41762)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 078870 604334 289218 862450 316162 216167 937885 847842 681883 184808 765275 212312 841685 010841 538163 018762 049498 716289 > 9114

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 115, 41762)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction