Information on Result #3131695
There is no (0, 22, 66)-net in base 64, because 20 times m-reduction would yield (0, 2, 66)-net in base 64, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 4159 > 642 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.