Information on Result #3132320
There is no (9, 84, 2602)-net in base 64, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (9, 83, 2602)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 826902 799664 428886 986286 629712 000714 604644 219680 988437 638213 980208 917813 047490 460985 671012 002666 938019 550254 668437 136264 633271 808142 633783 625483 238730 > 6483 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.