Information on Result #518046
There is no (9, 83, 2602)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 826902 799664 428886 986286 629712 000714 604644 219680 988437 638213 980208 917813 047490 460985 671012 002666 938019 550254 668437 136264 633271 808142 633783 625483 238730 > 6483
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 84, 2602)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |