Information on Result #3137453
There is no (3, 36, 2172)-net in base 128, because 1 times m-reduction would yield (3, 35, 2172)-net in base 128, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 56 798208 504175 051810 024273 051569 319016 924019 701184 997703 411690 158210 102965 > 12835 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.