Information on Result #3146876
There is no digital (86, 240, 375)-net over F3, because 1 times m-reduction would yield digital (86, 239, 375)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3239, 375, F3, 153) (dual of [375, 136, 154]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(386, 221, F3, 51) (dual of [221, 135, 52]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(385, 220, F3, 50) (dual of [220, 135, 51]-code), but
- the Johnson bound shows that N ≤ 22905 993227 448745 319194 488151 012424 723463 351500 755461 393112 800141 < 3135 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(385, 220, F3, 50) (dual of [220, 135, 51]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(386, 221, F3, 51) (dual of [221, 135, 52]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.