Information on Result #521741

There is no (73, 228, 233)-net in base 3, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(3228, 233, S3, 155), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (73, 229, 233)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction
2No (73, 230, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
3No (73, 231, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
4No (73, 232, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
5No (73, 233, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
6No (73, 234, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
7No (73, 235, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
8No (73, 236, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
9No (73, 237, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
10No (73, 238, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
11No (73, 239, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
12No (73, 240, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
13No (73, 241, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
14No (73, 242, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
15No (73, 243, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
16No (73, 244, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
17No (73, 245, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
18No (73, 246, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
19No (73, 247, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
20No (73, 248, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
21No (73, 249, 233)-net in base 3 [i]
22No (73, 250, 233)-net in base 3 [i]