Information on Result #522883
There is no (5, 86, 45)-net in base 7, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(786, 45, S7, 2, 81), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 405 368844 447017 397144 485951 958074 725759 929366 921792 254455 742666 234993 920165 / 82 > 786 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (5, 87, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (5, 88, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
3 | No (5, 89, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
4 | No (5, 90, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
5 | No (5, 91, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
6 | No (5, 92, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
7 | No (5, 93, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
8 | No (5, 94, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
9 | No (5, 95, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
10 | No (5, 96, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
11 | No (5, 97, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
12 | No (5, 98, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
13 | No (5, 99, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
14 | No (5, 100, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
15 | No (5, 101, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
16 | No (5, 102, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
17 | No (5, 103, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
18 | No (5, 104, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
19 | No (5, 105, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
20 | No (5, 106, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
21 | No (5, 107, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
22 | No (5, 108, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
23 | No (5, 109, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
24 | No (5, 110, 45)-net in base 7 | [i] | ||
25 | No (5, m, 45)-net in base 7 for arbitrarily large m | [i] | m-Reduction from Arbitrarily Large Net |