Information on Result #522883

There is no (5, 86, 45)-net in base 7, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(786, 45, S7, 2, 81), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (5, 87, 45)-net in base 7 [i]m-Reduction
2No (5, 88, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
3No (5, 89, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
4No (5, 90, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
5No (5, 91, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
6No (5, 92, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
7No (5, 93, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
8No (5, 94, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
9No (5, 95, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
10No (5, 96, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
11No (5, 97, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
12No (5, 98, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
13No (5, 99, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
14No (5, 100, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
15No (5, 101, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
16No (5, 102, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
17No (5, 103, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
18No (5, 104, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
19No (5, 105, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
20No (5, 106, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
21No (5, 107, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
22No (5, 108, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
23No (5, 109, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
24No (5, 110, 45)-net in base 7 [i]
25No (5, m, 45)-net in base 7 for arbitrarily large m [i]m-Reduction from Arbitrarily Large Net