Information on Result #599904
There is no digital (3, 51, 68)-net over F16, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield linear OA(1651, 68, F16, 48) (dual of [68, 17, 49]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(163, 19, S16, 3), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(162, 18, S16, 2), but
- bound for OAs with strength k = 2 [i]
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 271 > 162 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(162, 18, S16, 2), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No digital (3, 52, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No digital (3, 53, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | ||
3 | No digital (3, 54, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | ||
4 | No digital (3, 55, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | ||
5 | No digital (3, 56, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | ||
6 | No digital (3, 57, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | ||
7 | No digital (3, 58, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | ||
8 | No digital (3, 59, 68)-net over F16 | [i] | ||
9 | No digital (3, 60, 68)-net over F16 | [i] |