MinT - Best Known (29, 29+37, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (29, 29+37, s)-Nets in Base 16

(29, 29+37, 114)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (29, 66, 114)-net over F₁₆, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (5, 23, 49)-net over F₁₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 48)-sequence over F₁₆, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 49, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
      - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(29, 29+37, 161)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (29, 66, 161)-net over F₁₆, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 160)-sequence over F₁₆, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(29, 29+37, 177)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(29, 66, 177)-net in base 16, using

base change [i] based on digital (7, 44, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
    - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(29, 29+37, 11216)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (29, 66, 11217)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 65, 11217)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 1 852841 416773 663836 224314 329302 580743 146998 765498 805876 325071 527354 261759 571616 > 16⁶⁵ [i]