Best Known (32, 59, s)-Nets in Base 16
(32, 59, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 59, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 60, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 259)-net over F256, using
(32, 59, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (32, 59, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (32, 60, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 30, 321)-net over F256, using
(32, 59, 89024)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 59, 89025)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 58, 89025)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 6902 354642 057909 716885 201098 230835 281847 547028 535115 534874 989674 957376 > 1658 [i]