Best Known (20, 93, s)-Nets in Base 16
(20, 93, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 93, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 93, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(20, 93, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (20, 93, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 93, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(20, 93, 1117)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 93, 1118)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 92, 1118)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 612 789167 535152 325215 895120 978781 109012 314861 926403 618400 839709 005808 228145 998323 304589 901224 309724 483108 039846 > 1692 [i]