Best Known (165−100, 165, s)-Nets in Base 2
(165−100, 165, 43)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 165, 43)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 165, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
(165−100, 165, 48)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (65, 165, 48)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (65, 47)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 65 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
(165−100, 165, 128)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 165, 129)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55 379363 164120 379590 336034 310070 109190 177705 403104 > 2165 [i]