Best Known (238−100, 238, s)-Nets in Base 2
(238−100, 238, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 238, 68)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (138, 240, 68)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 90, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 150, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 90, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(238−100, 238, 96)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (138, 238, 96)-net over F2, using
(238−100, 238, 457)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 238, 458)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 446628 436874 648264 614538 261376 240416 684712 878670 606630 413676 166853 887344 > 2238 [i]