Best Known (242−100, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(242−100, 242, 70)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 242, 70)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 244, 70)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 72, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 172, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 72, 21)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(242−100, 242, 101)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (142, 242, 101)-net over F2, using
(242−100, 242, 487)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 242, 488)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 221858 785671 576803 455501 907163 777136 378088 681129 956936 911228 904297 981876 > 2242 [i]