Best Known (137, 137+101, s)-Nets in Base 2
(137, 137+101, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (137, 238, 68)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 149, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
(137, 137+101, 94)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (137, 238, 94)-net over F2, using
(137, 137+101, 450)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (137, 238, 451)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (137, 237, 451)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 227938 465559 481375 346950 845389 254336 984531 594550 951565 249407 854425 136804 > 2237 [i]