Best Known (259−104, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−104, 259, 77)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 259, 77)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (154, 259, 77)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (48, 100, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 159, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 100, 35)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(259−104, 259, 114)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (155, 259, 114)-net over F2, using
(259−104, 259, 565)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 259, 566)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 990468 683097 860105 947618 049245 305474 961931 734382 511978 522988 546698 182156 406837 > 2259 [i]