Best Known (140, 140+104, s)-Nets in Base 2
(140, 140+104, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 244, 68)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (140, 246, 68)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 154, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 92, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(140, 140+104, 95)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (140, 244, 95)-net over F2, using
(140, 140+104, 450)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 244, 451)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 30 416559 935639 740708 799704 352917 185527 782623 922296 501526 560098 299812 764016 > 2244 [i]