Best Known (255−112, 255, s)-Nets in Base 2
(255−112, 255, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 255, 68)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 95, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 160, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 95, 33)-net over F2, using
(255−112, 255, 92)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 255, 92)-net over F2, using
(255−112, 255, 432)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 255, 433)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 64319 838873 631844 977435 554690 000843 010954 380063 586616 901705 656681 825591 673776 > 2255 [i]