Best Known (260−113, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(260−113, 260, 70)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (147, 260, 70)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 77, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 183, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 77, 21)-net over F2, using
(260−113, 260, 96)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (147, 260, 96)-net over F2, using
(260−113, 260, 457)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (147, 260, 458)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (147, 259, 458)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 959029 720025 252872 482747 582567 229478 790889 545922 596347 754619 044419 004437 404348 > 2259 [i]