Best Known (243−118, 243, s)-Nets in Base 2
(243−118, 243, 57)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (125, 243, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (110, 243, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 8 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(243−118, 243, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (125, 243, 80)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (121, 243, 80)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 79)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 121 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (121, 79)-sequence over F2, using
(243−118, 243, 269)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (125, 243, 270)-net in base 2, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (125, 233, 270)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2233, 270, S2, 108), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 805716 963838 191291 276449 773987 529933 551024 538218 073842 142319 599295 484110 749441 196032 / 124 860938 893295 > 2233 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2233, 270, S2, 108), but