Best Known (136, 136+118, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 136+118, 63)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 254, 63)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 258, 63)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 82, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 176, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 82, 21)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(136, 136+118, 81)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 254, 81)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (126, 254, 81)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (126, 80)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 126 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (126, 80)-sequence over F2, using
(136, 136+118, 370)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 254, 371)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 32048 199726 747781 228938 147459 413795 076825 602872 733920 748961 069323 280907 521296 > 2254 [i]