Best Known (145−119, 145, s)-Nets in Base 2
(145−119, 145, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 145, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 145, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(145−119, 145, 24)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (26, 145, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 145, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(145−119, 145, 34)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 145, 35)-net in base 2, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 134, 35)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2134, 35, S2, 4, 108), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 2 526256 292021 047152 752093 085573 447201 849344 / 109 > 2134 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2134, 35, S2, 4, 108), but