Best Known (237−119, 237, s)-Nets in Base 2
(237−119, 237, 57)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (118, 237, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (110, 237, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 8 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (110, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(237−119, 237, 73)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (118, 237, 73)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 237, 73)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (114, 72)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 114 and N(F) ≥ 73, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (114, 72)-sequence over F2, using
(237−119, 237, 250)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (118, 237, 251)-net in base 2, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (118, 226, 251)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2226, 251, S2, 108), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 3 068587 541377 441989 862758 184092 770418 630025 105253 803106 088322 664550 769029 545984 / 21915 413575 > 2226 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2226, 251, S2, 108), but