Best Known (166−137, 166, s)-Nets in Base 2
(166−137, 166, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 166, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 166, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(166−137, 166, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (29, 166, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 166, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(166−137, 166, 38)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 166, 39)-net in base 2, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 147, 39)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2147, 39, S2, 4, 118), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 23371 180968 060093 052329 432749 735482 858267 475968 / 119 > 2147 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2147, 39, S2, 4, 118), but