Best Known (105, 105+143, s)-Nets in Base 2
(105, 105+143, 56)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (105, 248, 56)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (105, 55)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 7 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
(105, 105+143, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (105, 248, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 248, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(105, 105+143, 212)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (105, 248, 213)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (105, 247, 213)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 269 640105 162012 286280 916554 852626 512908 037413 293102 628864 291945 161917 234664 > 2247 [i]