Best Known (248−146, 248, s)-Nets in Base 2
(248−146, 248, 55)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 248, 55)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (100, 248, 55)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 6 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
(248−146, 248, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (102, 248, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 248, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(248−146, 248, 201)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 248, 202)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 514 820827 586627 956197 843325 920548 437491 432858 578043 539962 144081 851402 852125 > 2248 [i]