Best Known (65−19, 65, s)-Nets in Base 2
(65−19, 65, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 65, 60)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 66, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 33, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 33, 30)-net over F4, using
(65−19, 65, 81)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (46, 65, 81)-net over F2, using
(65−19, 65, 560)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 65, 561)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 64, 561)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 18 602025 290226 107764 > 264 [i]