Best Known (227−197, 227, s)-Nets in Base 2
(227−197, 227, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 227, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 227, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(227−197, 227, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (30, 227, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 227, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(227−197, 227, 38)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 227, 39)-net in base 2, because
- 40 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 187, 39)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2187, 39, S2, 5, 157), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 19615 942923 083377 386986 841947 523957 550319 860763 950107 852800 / 79 > 2187 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2187, 39, S2, 5, 157), but