Best Known (238−211, 238, s)-Nets in Base 2
(238−211, 238, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 238, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 238, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(238−211, 238, 24)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (27, 238, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 238, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(238−211, 238, 34)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 238, 35)-net in base 2, because
- 35 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 203, 35)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2203, 35, S2, 6, 176), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 797 041269 952459 176668 813197 801216 650851 012684 916265 246309 482496 / 59 > 2203 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2203, 35, S2, 6, 176), but