Best Known (52, 52+29, s)-Nets in Base 2
(52, 52+29, 54)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 81, 54)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 84, 54)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 42, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 42, 27)-net over F4, using
(52, 52+29, 59)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (52, 81, 59)-net over F2, using
(52, 52+29, 297)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 81, 298)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 80, 298)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 236195 450025 601296 074064 > 280 [i]