Best Known (174−30, 174, s)-Nets in Base 2
(174−30, 174, 320)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 174, 320)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (143, 174, 320)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 175, 320)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 35, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 35, 64)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 175, 320)-net over F2, using
(174−30, 174, 865)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (144, 174, 865)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2174, 865, F2, 2, 30) (dual of [(865, 2), 1556, 31]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2174, 1039, F2, 2, 30) (dual of [(1039, 2), 1904, 31]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(2172, 1038, F2, 2, 30) (dual of [(1038, 2), 1904, 31]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2172, 2076, F2, 30) (dual of [2076, 1904, 31]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2172, 2076, F2, 31) (dual of [2076, 1904, 32]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(30) ⊂ Ce(26) [i] based on
- linear OA(2166, 2048, F2, 31) (dual of [2048, 1882, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2047 = 211−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(2144, 2048, F2, 27) (dual of [2048, 1904, 28]-code), using an extension Ce(26) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2047 = 211−1, defining interval I = [1,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- linear OA(26, 28, F2, 3) (dual of [28, 22, 4]-code or 28-cap in PG(5,2)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(26, 32, F2, 3) (dual of [32, 26, 4]-code or 32-cap in PG(5,2)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(30) ⊂ Ce(26) [i] based on
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2172, 2076, F2, 31) (dual of [2076, 1904, 32]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(2172, 2076, F2, 30) (dual of [2076, 1904, 31]-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(2172, 1038, F2, 2, 30) (dual of [(1038, 2), 1904, 31]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2174, 1039, F2, 2, 30) (dual of [(1039, 2), 1904, 31]-NRT-code), using
(174−30, 174, 19917)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 174, 19918)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23953 782792 218234 655395 406014 176154 034332 826945 954268 > 2174 [i]