Best Known (128−32, 128, s)-Nets in Base 2
(128−32, 128, 138)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 128, 138)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 129, 138)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 43, 46)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 45, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 43, 46)-net over F8, using
(128−32, 128, 195)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (96, 128, 195)-net over F2, using
(128−32, 128, 1717)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 128, 1718)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 341 653707 376838 473753 983566 770881 719787 > 2128 [i]