Best Known (211−40, 211, s)-Nets in Base 2
(211−40, 211, 270)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (171, 211, 270)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (170, 210, 270)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 26, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (144, 184, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (6, 26, 10)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(211−40, 211, 645)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (171, 211, 645)-net over F2, using
(211−40, 211, 12420)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (171, 211, 12421)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3292 979615 884889 954711 887121 719671 205936 605966 624451 238719 266136 > 2211 [i]