MinT - Best Known (169, 169+41, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (169, 169+41, s)-Nets in Base 2

(169, 169+41, 266)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (169, 210, 266)-net over F₂, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (2, 22, 6)-net over F₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence (PirÅ¡iÄ‡ implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
2. digital (147, 188, 260)-net over F₂, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 47, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
        the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(169, 169+41, 584)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (169, 210, 584)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(169, 169+41, 11586)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (169, 210, 11587)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (169, 209, 11587)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 822 916606 328372 790886 679566 314332 397648 963504 894258 440054 983024 > 2²⁰⁹ [i]