Best Known (169−43, 169, s)-Nets in Base 2
(169−43, 169, 144)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 169, 144)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (125, 169, 144)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (125, 171, 144)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 57, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 57, 48)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (125, 171, 144)-net over F2, using
(169−43, 169, 234)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (126, 169, 234)-net over F2, using
(169−43, 169, 2191)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 169, 2192)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 168, 2192)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 377 209195 998491 051791 473439 581790 320406 447366 944936 > 2168 [i]