MinT - Best Known (92−43, 92, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (92−43, 92, s)-Nets in Base 2

(92−43, 92, 35)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (49, 92, 35)-net over F₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (48, 92, 35)-net over F₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₂ with g(F)Â =Â 41, N(F)Â =Â 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(92−43, 92, 36)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (49, 92, 36)-net over F₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (47, 92, 36)-net over F₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (47, 35)-sequence over F₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 47 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

(92−43, 92, 125)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (49, 92, 126)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 91, 126)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2⁹¹, 126, S₂, 42), but
  - the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 55 502804 531469 619431 939817 105996 644352 / 19958 577925 > 2⁹¹ [i]