Best Known (165, 165+44, s)-Nets in Base 2
(165, 165+44, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 209, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
(165, 165+44, 462)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 209, 462)-net over F2, using
(165, 165+44, 6523)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 209, 6524)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 823 971142 691647 827939 403927 791943 779970 310277 354451 663507 446534 > 2209 [i]