Best Known (186, 186+44, s)-Nets in Base 2
(186, 186+44, 271)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (186, 230, 271)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 30, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (156, 200, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 50, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 50, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (8, 30, 11)-net over F2, using
(186, 186+44, 670)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (186, 230, 670)-net over F2, using
(186, 186+44, 12672)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (186, 230, 12673)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1725 931863 779315 863946 491008 348717 173043 559698 094565 689979 956426 111808 > 2230 [i]