Best Known (145−50, 145, s)-Nets in Base 2
(145−50, 145, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 145, 68)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 148, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 74, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 74, 34)-net over F4, using
(145−50, 145, 99)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (95, 145, 99)-net over F2, using
(145−50, 145, 531)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 145, 532)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 438385 613897 034796 941297 859674 761680 871488 > 2145 [i]