Best Known (80, 80+51, s)-Nets in Base 2
(80, 80+51, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (80, 131, 60)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (80, 134, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 67, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 67, 30)-net over F4, using
(80, 80+51, 69)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (80, 131, 69)-net over F2, using
(80, 80+51, 338)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (80, 131, 339)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (80, 130, 339)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1390 811300 787875 023645 093307 135523 322720 > 2130 [i]