Best Known (142−53, 142, s)-Nets in Base 2
(142−53, 142, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 142, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 148, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 74, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 74, 33)-net over F4, using
(142−53, 142, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (89, 142, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 71, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(142−53, 142, 415)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 142, 416)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (89, 141, 416)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 849471 562930 877802 120046 225961 380529 788991 > 2141 [i]