Best Known (182, 182+53, s)-Nets in Base 2
(182, 182+53, 206)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 235, 206)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 34, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (148, 201, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 67, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (8, 34, 11)-net over F2, using
(182, 182+53, 421)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 235, 421)-net over F2, using
(182, 182+53, 5363)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 235, 5364)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 234, 5364)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27642 918273 420524 635076 941461 685211 517130 195949 426301 315272 103863 052140 > 2234 [i]