Best Known (185, 185+54, s)-Nets in Base 2
(185, 185+54, 206)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (185, 239, 206)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 35, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (150, 204, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 68, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 68, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (8, 35, 11)-net over F2, using
(185, 185+54, 425)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (185, 239, 425)-net over F2, using
(185, 185+54, 5007)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (185, 239, 5008)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 884920 262260 515689 366295 813767 354509 867930 729652 902063 316069 888872 752136 > 2239 [i]