Best Known (91, 91+55, s)-Nets in Base 2
(91, 91+55, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 146, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 152, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 76, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 76, 33)-net over F4, using
(91, 91+55, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (91, 146, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 73, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(91, 91+55, 413)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 146, 414)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 145, 414)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 098890 549592 010609 005580 522103 883490 121222 > 2145 [i]