Best Known (256−59, 256, s)-Nets in Base 2
(256−59, 256, 206)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (197, 256, 206)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 37, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (160, 219, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 73, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (8, 37, 11)-net over F2, using
(256−59, 256, 429)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (197, 256, 429)-net over F2, using
(256−59, 256, 5134)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (197, 256, 5135)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (197, 255, 5135)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 58044 971205 497784 284517 688564 039284 373869 577113 398671 789050 754417 064021 398272 > 2255 [i]