Best Known (123−61, 123, s)-Nets in Base 2
(123−61, 123, 43)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 123, 43)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 123, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
(123−61, 123, 44)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (62, 123, 44)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (62, 43)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 62 and N(F) ≥ 44, using
(123−61, 123, 137)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 123, 138)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (62, 122, 138)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2122, 138, S2, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 9 124501 527801 504428 538658 410979 148706 086912 / 1 627593 > 2122 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2122, 138, S2, 60), but